Data whispering: gently taming complex laboratory data for tuberculosis research
Chad Heilig — Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, CDC, 2013-03-14 — 20 slides
This rendering was constructed from an original PowerPoint presentation. Corrections of original text are indicated as “[corrected: X]”, redactions as “[redacted: X]”, and names withheld as “[generalized: X]”. Handouts and other auxiliary sources mentioned in the presentations are not available. The content of each presentation was believed to be correct and valid at the time of the presentation. This content, including references and links within the slides, has not been checked or updated when preparing this site. This rendering was facilitated by Anthropic Claude agentic tools for automated text extraction through computer vision and for assistance with compiling the completed sets.
Setting: Data whispering: gently taming complex laboratory data for tuberculosis research, 2013-03-14. CDC’s Division of Tuberculosis Elimination.
2013-03-14, sunny and cool. Can I bring The Little Prince‘s apprivoiser to tuberculosis data? These data are partial, a little messy, from real laboratories and real illness. I gave a talk, “Data Whispering: Gently Taming Complex Laboratory Data for Tuberculosis Research”. Gave doesn’t capture it, more like declaimed or manifested for the Division of Tuberculosis Delimitation. Opening slide: “No data were harmed in the making of this presentation.” Closing slide: Learn about the data. Learn from the data. Proceed incrementally, iteratively, responsibly. Build up complex logic through small steps. Refine, evolve; document, vet, guard. This talk feels like everything I want my career to be. I can do good things. I can help this division do good things. My branch chief believes it too; he believed it in me before I had a talk to put it in, back when it was just a way I worked. I ride that high. Who wouldn’t.
This presentation draws lessons from 4 DTBE lab-intensive studies: TBTC Study 28, TBTC NAA2m, ID-TB/HIV (Southeast Asia) and Kenya ICF. They are offered as “Some insights, humbly offered” that “Extend beyond lab data”. For each study it pairs the raw laboratory data with the “Goals for analytic data”. “Sample strategies for taming data” lays out a hierarchy of data structures (test → specimen → encounter → across encounters), events dated “by actual date rather than expected schedule”, and constructs refined “to support multiple analytic goals”. An event-history plot of TBTC Study 24 depicts baseline status, endpoints, durations and adverse events in one graphic.
Slide 1Data whispering: gently taming complex laboratory data for tuberculosis research
Chad Heilig, PhD Division of Tuberculosis Delimitation 2013-03-14
No data were harmed in the making of this presentation.
Slide 2Insights from lab-intensive studies
Stories from 4 DTBE studies
TBTC Study 28
TBTC NAA2m
ID-TB/HIV (Southeast Asia ICF)
Kenya ICF
Salient lessons
Some insights, humbly offered
Extend beyond lab data
Design and conduct of research
Abbreviations: DTBE = Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (CDC); HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; ICF = intensified case finding; ID = Improving Diagnosis of TB in People Living with HIV (study); NAA2m = TBTC Study NAA2m: a TBTC–TBRU collaborative study (Uganda, 2008–2010) of nucleic acid amplification tests and other markers of treatment response; TB = tuberculosis; TBTC = Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (CDC-sponsored).
Slide 3TBTC Study 28, phase 2B trial (1)
Laboratory data
433 participants (HRZE, MRZE), ~20 sites
Sputum at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8*, 12, 16, etc
1–3 at 0; 2 at 8*; 1 each at other times
Smear, solid culture, liquid culture, DST
Variation in lab methods, media, contamination
Between and within sites (e.g., switch to MGIT)
Reference DST at CDC
Abbreviations: CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DST = drug susceptibility testing; HRZE = isoniazid (H), rifampin (R), pyrazinamide (Z), ethambutol (E): the standard 4-drug regimen; MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); MRZE = moxifloxacin (M), rifampin (R), pyrazinamide (Z), ethambutol (E): moxifloxacin substituted for isoniazid; TBTC = Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (CDC-sponsored).
Slide 4TBTC Study 28, phase 2B trial (2)
Goals for analytic data
Microbiological eligibility
Mtb+, pansusceptible on culture at baseline
Endpoints
Mtb± at end of intensive phase
8–10 weeks therapy; 1–2 specimens; multimedia
Time to first negative, stable conversion
Treatment failure
Abbreviations: Mtb = Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the bacterium that causes TB); TBTC = Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (CDC-sponsored).
Slide 5TBTC NAA2m, cohort (1)
Laboratory data
50 participants, UG, AFB 3/4+
Sputum at weeks 0 (×2), 2, 4, 6, 8 (×2), 12, etc
Qualitative results
AFB smear; LJ, 7H10, 7H11, 7H10S, 7H11S; MGIT
Quantitative results
CFU on LJ, 7H10, 7H11; DTD on MGIT
Abbreviations: 7H10 = Middlebrook 7H10 agar (solid culture medium for mycobacteria); 7H10S = Middlebrook 7H10 agar, selective (with added antibiotics to suppress contaminants); 7H11 = Middlebrook 7H11 agar (solid culture medium for mycobacteria); 7H11S = Middlebrook 7H11 agar, selective (e.g. Mitchison's selective 7H11); AFB = acid-fast bacilli; CFU = colony-forming unit(s); DTD = days to detection (time until a liquid MGIT culture signals positive); LJ = Löwenstein–Jensen (egg-based solid culture medium for mycobacteria); MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); NAA2m = TBTC Study NAA2m: a TBTC–TBRU collaborative study (Uganda, 2008–2010) of nucleic acid amplification tests and other markers of treatment response; TBTC = Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (CDC-sponsored); UG = Uganda.
Slide 6TBTC NAA2m, cohort (2)
Goals for analytic data
Qualitative
Cultures: Mtb+, contaminated, Mtb–
Specimens: agreement across cultures
Quantitative
Cultures: detectable (NC, NG, yes); measure
Specimens: correlation of CFUs, DTD with CFU
Abbreviations: CFU = colony-forming unit(s); DTD = days to detection (time until a liquid MGIT culture signals positive); Mtb = Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the bacterium that causes TB); NAA2m = TBTC Study NAA2m: a TBTC–TBRU collaborative study (Uganda, 2008–2010) of nucleic acid amplification tests and other markers of treatment response; NC = not countable; NG = no growth; TBTC = Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (CDC-sponsored).
Slide 7Figure: latent class model
Sensitivity and specificity with respect to latent class model (4)
Convex hulls and 99% confidence ellipses for all 5 media
Description
Panels
1
Elements
5 open point markers in 5 colors, each surrounded by an ellipse of the same color, depict sensitivity and specificity for 5 media named in a legend at lower left: LJ (blue), 7H10NS (green), 7H11NS (red), 7H10S (purple), 7H11S (orange)
Horizontal
Specificity, 1.0 to 0.3, decreasing from left to right
Vertical
Sensitivity, 0.3 to 1.0; ellipses span about 0.69 to 1.0
Visible pattern
All 5 ellipses sit above sensitivity of about 0.7. Purple (7H10S) and orange (7H11S) ellipses overlap at the upper left, around specificity 0.75 to 0.85 and sensitivity 0.9 to 1.0, Red (7H11NS) ellipse around specificity 0.5. Green (7H10NS) and blue (LJ) ellipses overlap in the middle, around specificity 0.6 and sensitivity 0.7 to 0.9. Every ellipse is wider than it is tall.
Open and filled circles in 6 colors depict CFU/mL against DTD; the legend at upper right pairs an open and a filled circle for each of Week 0 (orange), Week 2 (olive), Week 4 (green), Week 6 (cyan), Week 8 (lavender) and Week 12 (pink). Fitted line segments run through the main scatter of points, labeled "LJ / 7H10NS / 7H11NS". Below the log scale, rows of jittered points labeled NC and NG.
Horizontal
DTD, 0 to 40 (ticks every 10); axis line ends at 42; points from about 2 to 42, with additional points beyond the right extent.
Vertical
CFU/mL, log scale 10^1 to 10^7, then 2 categorical rows below, NC and NG
Visible pattern
Points scattered in 3 groups: an oval field from top left to center and 2 bands at labels NC and NG. Colors nearly follow hue gradient from left to right. Line segments depict models fitted to values with observed DTD and CFU.
Abbreviations: 7H10NS = Middlebrook 7H10 agar, nonselective (without added antibiotics); 7H11NS = Middlebrook 7H11 agar, nonselective; CFU = colony-forming unit(s); DTD = days to detection (time until a liquid MGIT culture signals positive); LJ = Löwenstein–Jensen (egg-based solid culture medium for mycobacteria); NC = not countable; NG = no growth.
Slide 9ID-TB/HIV, cross-sectional (1)
Laboratory data
~2000 participants w HIV; KH/TH/VN
Specimens: 3 sputum, urine, stool, blood, LN
Smear (not blood), LJ (×2), MGIT (TH/VN)
Scanty smears
Limited Mtb ID per specimen; some GenProbe
Abbreviations: HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; ID = Improving Diagnosis of TB in People Living with HIV (study); KH = Cambodia; LJ = Löwenstein–Jensen (egg-based solid culture medium for mycobacteria); LN = lymph node; MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); Mtb = Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the bacterium that causes TB); TB = tuberculosis; TH = Thailand; VN = Vietnam.
Slide 10ID-TB/HIV, cross-sectional (2)
Goals for analytic data
Incremental yield (incomplete 4×7 per person)
Across detection methods (smear, LJ, MGIT)
Across anatomic site (sputum, extrapulmonary)
Occurrence of exceptional Mtb+ (e.g., stool only)
Reference standard for screening/diagnosis algorithm
Abbreviations: HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; ID = Improving Diagnosis of TB in People Living with HIV (study); LJ = Löwenstein–Jensen (egg-based solid culture medium for mycobacteria); MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); TB = tuberculosis.
Slide 11ID-TB/HIV incomplete 4×7
Sput 1
Sput 2
Sput 3
Urine
Stool
Blood
LNA‡
Smear
•
•
•
•
•
—
•
LJ 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
LJ 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
MGIT
†
†
†
†
†
†
†
Every specimen
Every specimen in TH, VN (but not KH)
Indicated for LN ≥1 cm (≥2 cm inguinal)
Abbreviations: HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; ID = Improving Diagnosis of TB in People Living with HIV (study); KH = Cambodia; LJ = Löwenstein–Jensen (egg-based solid culture medium for mycobacteria); LN = lymph node; LNA = lymph node aspirate; MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); TB = tuberculosis; TH = Thailand; VN = Vietnam.
Slide 12Kenya ICF, cross-section (1)
Laboratory data
~800 participants w HIV, western KE
Specimens
Initial: sputum (spot ×2, morning), stool, LN
Follow-up: sputum (spot ×2)
Tests
ZN, fluorescent microscopy, MGIT, Xpert
Vary by specimen, sputum volume, follow-up
Abbreviations: HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; KE = Kenya; LN = lymph node; MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); Xpert = Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid GeneXpert cartridge nucleic acid amplification test for TB and rifampicin resistance); ZN = Ziehl–Neelsen (acid-fast stain for smear microscopy).
Slide 13Kenya ICF, cross-section (2)
Goals for analytic data
Incremental yield
Across method (smear, Xpert, MGIT)
Across specimen multiplicity/type
Reference standard for WHO screening
Abbreviations: MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); WHO = World Health Organization; Xpert = Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid GeneXpert cartridge nucleic acid amplification test for TB and rifampicin resistance).
Slide 14[corrected: Kenya ICF 4×7]
Initial visit
Follow-up visits
Spot Sput 1
Spot Sput 2
Morn Sput
LNA‡
Stool
Spot Sput 1
[corrected: Spot Sput 2]
Fluor
•
•
•
•
•
•
MGIT
•
•
•
•
•
•
ZN
•
•
Xpert
•
†
Every specimen
If sufficient volume
Indicated for LN ≥1 cm (≥2 cm inguinal)
Abbreviations: ICF = intensified case finding; LN = lymph node; LNA = lymph node aspirate; MGIT = Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (liquid culture system); Xpert = Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid GeneXpert cartridge nucleic acid amplification test for TB and rifampicin resistance); ZN = Ziehl–Neelsen (acid-fast stain for smear microscopy).
Slide 15Sample strategies for taming data
Hierarchy of data structures
Within test (smear, culture, Xpert)
Within specimen, across tests
Within participant encounter*, across specimens
Across participant encounters
Date-based events by actual date rather than expected schedule
Define, refine data constructs to support multiple analytic goals (use experience)
Abbreviations: Xpert = Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid GeneXpert cartridge nucleic acid amplification test for TB and rifampicin resistance).
27 horizontal rows, one per participant, each made of line segments in 3 styles and point markers in 5 symbols, as the legend at upper right names them: thin light gray line, Prestudy treatment; thick gray line, Study treatment; dotted line, Follow-up; filled circle, Positive culture; open circle, Negative culture; diamond with a cross, Treatment failure/relapse; boxed x, Hepatic adverse event; x, Nonhepatic adverse event. Rows are grouped under 4 headings: "Incomplete treatment, incomplete follow-up < 6 months" (8 rows), "Incomplete treatment, incomplete follow-up ≥ 6 months" (2 rows), "Incomplete treatment, complete follow-up" (15 rows), "Complete treatment, late positive culture" (2 rows)
Horizontal
Days since start of TB therapy, -30 to 390, ticks every 30
Vertical
Participant index, 1 to 27 from top to bottom, in the 4 labeled groups; no numeric scale
Visible pattern
Filled circles (positive cultures) cluster at or just before day 0 in nearly every row. Thin light gray lines run from day 0 to about day 60 in most rows, and thick gray study-treatment segments begin around day 30 to 70 and end anywhere from about day 80 to 200. Hepatic adverse event markers fall between about day 70 and 175. Treatment failure/relapse diamonds appear in 3 rows, 1 near day 120 and 2 near day 325.
Cain KP, McCarthy KD, Heilig CM, Monkongdee P, Tasaneeyapan T, Kanara N, Kimerling ME, Chheng P, Thai S, Sar B, et al. An algorithm for tuberculosis screening and diagnosis in people with HIV. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010-02-25; 362(8): 707–716. (slide14)Elsewhere on the web (opens in a new tab)
Reves R, Heilig CM, Tapy JM, Bozeman L, Kyle RP, Hamilton CD, Bock N, Narita M, Wing D, Hershfield E, et al. Intermittent tuberculosis treatment for patients with isoniazid intolerance or drug resistance. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2014-05-01; 18(5): 571–580. (slide16)Elsewhere on the web (opens in a new tab)
Related works, not cited
Heilig CM, Feng P-JI, Joloba ML, Johnson JL, Morgan K, Gitta P, Boom WH, Mayanja-Kizza H, Eisenach KD, Bozeman L, Goldberg SV. How we determined the most reliable solid medium for studying treatment of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2014-05; 94(3): 317–322.Elsewhere on the web (opens in a new tab)
Joloba ML, Johnson JL, Feng P-JI, Bozeman L, Goldberg SV, Morgan K, Gitta P, Boom HW, Heilig CM, Mayanja-Kizza H, Eisenach KD. What is the most reliable solid culture medium for tuberculosis treatment trials? Tuberculosis. 2014-05; 94(3): 311–316.Elsewhere on the web (opens in a new tab)
Mac Kenzie WR, Heilig CM, Bozeman L, Johnson JL, Muzanye G, Dunbar D, Jost KC, Diem L, Metchock B, Eisenach K, et al. Geographic differences in time to culture conversion in liquid media: Tuberculosis Trials Consortium study 28. Culture conversion is delayed in Africa. PLOS ONE. 2011-04-11; 6(4): e18358.Elsewhere on the web (opens in a new tab)